Free Essay

Gsis vs. Court of Appeal G.R. No. 101439

In: Historical Events

Submitted By liaoweiqin
Words 811
Pages 4
DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY
Graduate School of Business
Master of Business Administration

Business Law
Case 3
GSIS vs. Court of Appeals

Submitted by:
Liao, Weiqin
Facts of the case • National Food Authority (NFA, formerly National Grains Authority) was the owner of a Chevrolet truck which was insured against liabilities for death of and injuries to third persons with the GSIS.

• On May 9, 1979, at about 7:00 in the evening at Tabon-Tabon, Butuan City, the said truck driven by Guillermo Corbeta collided with a public utility vehicle, a Toyota Tamaraw. The Toyota Tamaraw was owned and operated by Victor Uy, under the name and style of “Victory Line”. The Tamaraw was a total wreck.

• The Toyota Tamaraw insurer was Mabuhay Insurance and Guaranty Co. (MIGC).

• The truck crossed over to the other lane, its left front wheel was detached and the truck traveled for about fifty (50) meters and fell into a ravine.

• All the collision victims were passengers of the Toyota Tamaraw. Five (5) passengers died while ten (10) others sustained bodily injuries. Among those injured were private respondents, Victoria Jaime Vda. de Kho and Gloria Kho Vda. de Calabia. Among the dead were Maxima Ugmad Vda. de Kho, Roland Kho and Willie Calabia, Sr.

Legal Problems

• First Case (Civil – Case No. 2196) June 5, 1979 o Uy against NFA and Corbeta due for quasi-delict, damages and attorney’s fees • Second Case (Civil – Case No. 2225) August 27, 1979 o Injured passenger, Librado Taer, against Uy, MIGC. o In turn, Uy filed a cross-claim against MIGC, Corbeta and NFA • Third case (Civil – Case no. 2256) November 26, 1979 o Private responders against NFA and Corbeta for damages dut to quasi-delict. o GSIS as insurer of the truck; Uy for breach of contract of carriage; and MIGC as insurer of the Toyota Tamaraw. o GSIS Also elevated the decision in this civil case to the same appellate court.

Resolved by court • First Case (Civil – Case No. 2196) June 5, 1979 o The RTC awarded Uy the total amount of P109,100.00 for damages • Second Case (Civil – Case No. 2225) August 27, 1979 o RTC dismissed the case against UY and orered MIGC o Corbeta and NFA to pay plaintiff Tear (Private Passenger), jointly and severally, the amount of P40,559.94 for actual, compensatory, and moral damages plus attorney’s fees. • Third case (Civil – Case no. 2256) November 26, 1979 o Damages likewise award to the herein private respondents. o Corbeta, NFA and MIGC are solidarity liable for damages. Injured Victims Victoria Jainme Vda. De Kho Transportation and and Telegraph Expense P 2,372.30 Other Compensatory/Moral Damages P10,000.00 Loss of Income P12,000.00 Total P33,307.36 Gloria Kho Vda. De Calabia Other Compensatory/Moral Damages P10,000.00 Total P10,000.00 Heirs of Deceased Victims Funeral Death Mora Total Expenses Indemnity Damages

Heirs of Willie P 2,500.00 P18,000.00 P10,000.00 P30,500.00 Calabia , Sr.

Heirs of P 2,500.00 P18,000.00 P10,000.00 P30,500.00 Roland Kho

Heirs of Maxima P 2,500.00 P18,000.00 P10,000.00 P30,500.00 Ugmad Vda. De Kho

o GSIS direct liable to the private respondents base con contract in the following amount: Injured Victims Medical Expense Victoria Jainme Vda. De Kho P832.00 Gloria Kho Vda. De Calabia P8,935.06 Heirs of Deceased Victims Death Indemnity Heirs of Willie Calabia , Sr. P12,000.00 Heirs of Roland Kho P12,000.00 Heirs of Maxima Ugmad Vda. De Kho P12,000.00

Evaluation • GSIS and NFA are liable under different obligations. GSIS not solidary liability with the NFA or the negligent operator of the cargo truck because it claims that they are liabile under different obligations. It assert that the NFA’s liability is base on quasi-delict, while GSIS’s liability is based on the contract of insurance. Citing articles 1207 and 1208 of the Civil Code of the Philippine, petitioner states that when there are two or more debtors or two or more creditors, the obligation as a general rule is joint. It claims that the only exceptions are: (1) when there is a stipulation for solidary obligation; (2) when the nature of the obligation requires solidary liability; and (3) when the law declares the obligation to be solidary. However, since neither the provision of the contract nor the insurance law provides for solidary liability. The liability of GSIS should base on the insurance contract.

Recommendation • NFA should increase their monitoring on recruitment, must use qualify person on qualify position. • Make sure each angle of the truck, owned by NFA, can be seen by driver in corresponding side mirror. • Government should limit and monitor the maximum speed of truck base on circumstances of the road.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Georgia Court of Appeals

...Georgia Court of Appeals Abstract This paper is about my experience at the Georgia Court of Appeals in Atlanta Georgia. It is also about the judges, its symbol and what an appeal court actually is V. other courts in the criminal justice system. The history of Georgia Court of Appeals; The Court of Appeals has statewide appellate jurisdiction of all cases except constitutional questions, land title disputes, the construction of wills, murder, election contests, habeas corpus, extraordinary remedies, divorce and alimony and cases where original appellate jurisdiction lies with the superior courts. The Court of Appeals of Georgia certifies legal questions to the Supreme Court. The first courtroom cases were held in an courtroom in the afternoon while in the morning the supreme court would hold their cases before the appeals. These were continued for a while but would be held on separate days. In 1956, a motto was created and engraved on a marble wall behind a bench. This motto stated: "Upon the integrity, wisdom and independence of the judiciary depend the sacred rights of free men." Later there was a first lady judge by the name of Dorothy Toth who changed it to "Upon the integrity, wisdom and independence of the judiciary depend the sacred rights of free men and women." At a point and time, the Chief Judge was elected by the Court and served in that capacity at the pleasure of the Court. Chief Judge is then rotated; they are rotated for about a two-year term and upon......

Words: 1635 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

G.R No. 172733

...SPS. CORNELIO JOEL I. ORDEN and MARIA NYMPHA V. ORDEN, and REGISTER OF DEEDS OF NEGROSORIENTAL, Petitioners, versus SPS. ARTURO AUREA and MELODIA C. AUREA, SPS. ERNESTO P. COBILE and SUSANA M. COBILE, and FRANKLIN M. QUIJANO, Respondents. G.R. No. 172733 August 20, 2008 Fact This case is about the legal consequence when spouses Ernesto P. Cobile and Susana M. Cobile, respondents in a contract to Deed of Absolute Sale selling on parcel of land fail to make a promissory due date. When there is a contact, Deed of Absolute Sale and Joint Affidavit between petitioners Orden and respondents Cobile, respondents Cobile paid the amount of 384,000.00 pesos as a partial payment to petitioners Orden. Moreover, there is an evidence receipt that respondents Cobile paid partial payment. Thus, Orden, petitioners and Cobile respondents make a promissory that respondents Cobile promise to pay petitioners Orden the amount of 566,000.00 pesos on or before October 31, 1994 and the remaining balance will be paid soon as the titles of the properties shall have been transferred to respondents Cobile. However, respondents Cobile fail to pay the amount 566,000.00 pesos due to October 31, 1994 and they paid 354,596.28 as representing a partial payment through Arturo Aurea. Petitioners Orden informed respondents Cobile that if respondents Cobile fail to pay the remaining balances dated March 11, 1995, petitioners Orden will contract other interested investors. Since respondents Cobile did...

Words: 790 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Supreme Court Speech: Epperson vs Arkansas

...Name: Allison Melbert Class Time: M, W, F 1-1:50 Identifying Data Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about Epperson vs. Arkansas court case dealing with the religious schooling taught in public schools. Central Idea: The Supreme Court case between Epperson and Arkansas deals with the problem of whether it’s ok or not to teach the Evolution theory to children in the state of Arkansas. Type of Speech: Supreme Court Organizational Pattern: Event Introduction: Attention Getter: How many people were taught the Theory of Evolution in a high school class? Thesis: In this speech I will present the facts of the court, the religious views of Evolution, both sides of this argument, including Susan Epperson’s side and Arkansas State’s side, and the judicial decision. Preview Statement: In this speech I will present the facts of the court, with both sides of the argument, and the judicial decision. (Trans: I will begin today by presenting how the theory of evolution contradicts religion). Body: I. In the case of Epperson vs. Arkansas, the driving force behind the ban of the theory of evolution were moral views. A. The population of Arkansas in the 1960’s was made up of rural traditional families with conservative views. 1. The conservative views were mainly affiliate with religious beliefs. 2. The driving force behind the outlaw of the teaching of evolution was the fact that evolution, “contradicts a literal interpretation of the first chapter of......

Words: 1040 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Merritt V Merritt [1970] 1 Wlr 1211 Court of Appeal

...offer and posted the letter before Kumara changed his mind and faxed to Nihal. Therefore a contract is completed on the 10th January when Nihal accepted the offer. So there is no valid contract between Kumara and Ravi. Next under the recognition theory, it held that the contract is not completed till acceptance come to the knowledge of the offeror. If so there is a valid agreement between Kumara and Ravi as Kumara made a fresh agreement with Ravi on 13th January, and Nihal’s acceptance came to the knowledge of Kumara on the 14th January after he made a contract with Ravi. Expedition theory held that the contract is completed as soon as the letter of acceptance is posted and out of control, and this expedition theory is accepted bu courts today as the rule. Therefore under this theory the contract between Kumara and Nihal came to existence on 10th January when Nihal posted the acceptance letter. So Kumara cannot make an agreement with Ravi as Nihal has accepted the offer before Kumara changed his mind and the faxed Nihal on the 12th January. So there is no agreement between Kumara and Ravi as the revocation of the offer has to be brought to the notice of the offeree before acceptance for it to be effective. But this revocation was made by Kumara on 12th January through fax after Nihal accepted the offer on 10th January. As an example the case of Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 CPD 344. Thefore it can be concluded that there is no valid agreement between Kumra and......

Words: 1799 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Warren vs Rehnquist Courts

...Running head: WARREN VERSUS REHNQUIST COURTS Warren versus Rehnquist Courts Michael Walker Park University Abstract The criminal justice system is greatly shaped by the civil rights safeguarded under the Bill of Rights. The court jurisprudence with regard to national security and civil liberties largely revolves around the provisions of the Bill of Rights (Baker, 2003). This paper discusses Chief Justices Earl Warren and William Rehnquist’s significant decisions and the effects they had on the balance between social order maintenance and individual liberties. Warren versus Rehnquist Courts Earl Warren held the position of Chief Justice between 1953 and 1969. He led a liberal majority, who utilized the judicial authority to consternate their conservative opponents. The Warren Court promoted the federal power, judicial power, civil liberties, and civil rights in a dramatic fashion. The Rehnquist Court, on the other hand, took a conservative approach in criminal justice (Pollak, 1979). The most significant case that the Warren Court decided with regard to civil liberties was Brown v Board of Education of Copeka, Kansas (1954). The court unanimously ruled that there is no place for the doctrine of separate but equal doctrine in the sphere of public education. The Warren Court demonstrated its value for liberalism and activism. The view of the Warren Court was that states are a hindrance in the enhancement of a just nation. In the sphere of criminal procedure and...

Words: 2153 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

James vs Us Tax Court Case Brief

...an insurance company and failed to include these funds as gross income for tax purposes. The taxpayer disputed that the embezzled money should not qualify as taxable income as the funds were already required to be returned. James used a previous decision from Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox to show that the money was not taxable as he had “no claim of right” to the money because he no longer had possession of it. The court held that all income was to be taxed The court ultimately overturned the Wilcox case and ruled that the money was to be included in gross income because both legal and illegal earnings that are) acquired without the consensual recognition of an obligation to repay, are fully taxable. James was required to face legal penalties of three years in jail for his attempt at evading taxes in addition to the tax penalties of the crime. ISSUE: The issue being litigated in this case is whether embezzled funds should be a part of the embezzler’s gross income regardless of a repayment obligation. HOLDING: The Supreme Court ruled in agreement with the lower court’s decision and held that the defendant’s embezzled earnings were to be included on his tax return as gross income. LEGAL ANALYSIS: This ruling was supported by §61 of the Internal Revenue Code which defines gross income. §61 states that gross income means all income from whatever source derived. By evading the taxes for the earnings, the taxpayer was in violation with the IRC of 1939......

Words: 534 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Hawkins V. the State. Court of Appeals of Georgia.

...Report on E evidence admissibility issues in the case of HAWKINS v. THE STATE. Court of Appeals of Georgia. MEMORANDUM Subject: E evidence admissibility issues Using an online data base or an internet search engine, search for a situation in which an electronic device or recorder implicated someone of a crime or wrong doing. Write a report on the E evidence admissibility issues in the case. In your report, describe how that evidence was discovered and retrieved by law officers or computer forensic experts MEMORANDUM Subject: E evidence admissibility issues Here is the report you requested on E evidence admissibility issues on a case that involved the use of electronic device or recorder which implicated someone of a crime or wrong doing. I am confident that the knowledge gleaned from this report will be invaluable. Table of contents | Memo of authorization | 1 | Memo of transmittal | 2 | Executive summary | 4 | 1 Introduction | 4 | 1.1 Purpose | 4 | 1.2 Scope | 4 | 1.3 Method | 4 | 1.4 Limitations | 5 | 1.5 Assumptions | 5 | 1.6 Background | 5 | 2 Findings | 7 | 3 Discussion | 7 | 4 Conclusion | 10 | References | 11 | Executive summary This report looks at the admissibility issues pertaining to a case that involved the use of an electronic device by the state to implicate and subsequently convict a perpetrator of a crime. The defendant on conviction sought a judicial review of the lower court’s ruling.......

Words: 2133 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Appellant's Opening Brief to the Colorado Court of Appeal

...JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT APPELLANT LISA KAY BRUMFIEL (“Brumfiel”), appeals all Orders of Judge Pratt’s beginning with the Order applying the CAPP program through the Order Granting CLG Attorney’s fees. All orders are final (Rule 54(b)). The Appeal, subject to C.A.R. 31(c) and C. A. R. 28(a), RT=Reporters Transcript; AA: =Appendix; Ad: =Addendum (Orders attached to brief). II. STATEMENT OF ISSUES A. Whether the court erred in concluding that Brumfiel failed to state a claim under 12(b) (5); and concurrently that defendant lacked standing. B. Whether the Statute of Limitation of 1 year was tolled under the Continuing injury Doctrine in Brumfiel’s FDCPA claim. C. Whether the court erred in denying Brumfiel’s Motion to Dismiss on grounds that the Trust had standing to foreclose and denying her defenses including constitutional defense. D. Whether the Court erred Granting Plf’s Summary Judgment, where the Trustee’s status as holder was disputed as sufficient to foreclose. E. Whether the Court erred by holding that Brumfiel may not, as a non-party, challenge an assignment or agreement. F. Whether the court committed error by applying the Civil Access Pilot Program (CAPP) to Defendant’s foreclosure. G. Whether the court abused its discretion by making rulings on evidence that denied her a chance to tell her side, and withholding excess proceeds from the sale. H. Whether the plaintiff waived any deficiency judgment. 1 I. Whether the court erred by granting the CLG attorney’s......

Words: 10170 - Pages: 41

Free Essay

Vogt vs. Herron Construction Court Case

...VOGT v. HERRON CONSTRUCTION, INC Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two 200 Cal.App.4th 643 (2011) 132 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683 The heading above describes the title and citation of this case. The name of the case is Vogt v. Herron Construction, Inc. Vogt is the plaintiff and appellant while Herron Construction is the defendant and respondent. This case was decided in the court of appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two on November 1, 2011. The citation states that this case can be found in 200 Cal. App. 4th 643. FACTS Augustus Vogt worked for Performance Concrete which was the concrete subcontractor for a construction project in Riverside,Ca. The framing contractor for the same construction project was Herron Construction, Inc, for which Jesus Cruz worked. At the worksite, employees typically park near their assigned job for the day. There was no designated parking area for subcontractor employees. On October 31, 2007, Cruz parked his personal vehicle on the work site. No one told him where to park. When Vogt noticed Cruz’s truck in the way of the cement truck, he asked Cruz to move it. He explained to Cruz that Performance was about to start pouring cement nearby. Vogt later explained that workers being asked to move their cars and other vehicles on the job site “ happens all the time”... “We’re not going to pour if a car’s there because we don’t want the liability of splashing the paint.” When Cruz was moving his truck, he ran......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Kho vs. Halili

...Republic of the Philippines COURT OF APPEALS MANILA EIGHTH (8th) DIVISION ***** HAYDEN KHO, JR., CA-G.R. SP. NO. 121130 Petitioner, Members: -versus- MA. KATRINA IREN P. HALILI, Respondent. TIJAM, N.G., Chairman, BARZA, R.F. and SORONGON, E.D. JJ. Promulgated: ____________________ x---------------------------------------------x DECISION •SORONGON, E.D., J. : It is axiomatic that a license to practice a profession is not an inherent right but a mere privilege burdened with responsibilities. Possession of the qualifications prescribed by law prior to admission to a profession is not only a prerequisite to the grant of a license but a continuing requirement. Towards this end, the State, by virtue of its general police power, may suspend or revoke the professional license of an erring registered professional, in this case a medical practitioner, showing any fault or deficiency in his moral character, honesty, probity or good demeanor. CA-G.R. SP. NO. 121130 DECISION Page 2 In this Petition for Review under Rule 43 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, petitioner Hayden Kho, Jr. seeks to reverse and set aside the August 22, 2011 Decision 1 of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) in Administrative Case No. A-373 which affirmed the earlier Decision2 of the Board of Medicine dated November 20, 2009 finding him guilty of Immorality, Dishonorable and/or Unethical Conduct and the latter's subsequent Order 3 dated February 8, 2010 denying petitioner's Motion for......

Words: 5371 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Us vs. Dominique Stephens Court Report

...US v. Dominique Stephens In the case of the US versus Dominique Stephens, I played the role of the court reporter. In a real case I would’ve documented every word that was spoken in that courtroom. During the mock trial however, I assisted in helping the defense and prosecution build their cases. The case was tough, but having a strong defense and prosecution really cleared up some foggy topics. On June 17, 2009, at 10:32 p.m, Dominique Stephens, had called the police letting them know that she had shot her husband, Donovan. The police arrived and found her husband’s dead body face down on the ground under a blanket that had 3 bullet holes and was covered in blood. Dominique was arrested after confessing to shooting her husband and pointing to the pistol near the bed. When she arrived at the police station, Dominique wavered her right to remain silent, until the detective wrote a statement. She signed the statement and the prosecution charged Mrs. Stephens with the First Degree Murder of her husband Donovan Stephens. After confessing, however, she asserts through her attorney that it was an act of self-defense and that she is suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome. She claims that the lives of her and her kids was in imminent danger. Statutory law claims that, “Whoever, being of sound memory and discretion, kills another purposely, either of deliberate and premeditated malice or by means of poison... is guilty of murder in the first degree.” Case......

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Outline the Criminal Courts and Appeal System.

...Outline the criminal courts and appeal system. (10 marks) The courts of first instance in the criminal court hierarchy are the Magistrates’ Court and the Crown Court. The Magistrates’ Court conducts trials of both summary and either-way offences that are to be tried summarily, such as theft, while the Crown Court deals exclusively with serious criminal cases, trying indictable offences such as murder, or either-way offences which are to be tried on indictment, such as theft. In the event that a party to a case wishes to appeal against the conviction or sentence awarded by the Magistrates’ Court, the case is then heard on appeal by the Crown Court. Cases can also be heard on appeal from the Magistrates’ Court by the High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) by way of case stated on point of law. Cases heard in either the High Court or Crown Court are all heard on appeal at first by the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and then to the Supreme Court, which is the final court of appeal available. Appeals from the Crown Court, which are heard by the Court of Appeal, can be due to several grounds, including misdirection of law or facts and jury irregularity. The Court of Appeal has the power to quash convictions or even order a new trial. Each criminal case is sent to the Magistrates’ Court at first, for either bail hearings to be conducted or plea entry hearings. Where the offence charged is an indictable offence, a Magistrates’ Court will conduct sending for trial......

Words: 303 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Court of Appeals

...Court of Appeals An appeal is entitled to an individual (defendant) who has been found to be guilty by the court for some of all of the charges put against him or her. This person can appeal one or more levels of the appellate court. An appeal can occur in several levels of the courts. An example of this is the appealing to the circuit court of appeals first then going up to the next level. This process can continue until it has reached the United States Supreme Court. An appeal is known as a formal letter of request in which a highest court must review the decisions that had been made by a lower court. Usually the defendant in a lower court who had been found to be guilty of a crime will make an appeal. Some reasons that an appeal maybe made is insufficient evidence, how the jury handled the case, any violation of rights or the possibility of a mistake that was made by the judge hearing the case. An appeal can influence the processes and procedures of a court if the guilty defendant’s appeal has been won over by the higher courts. The entire trial will have to be examined at the beginning in detail, looking for any errors that may exist and had a factor in the ending verdict of that case. After this long drawn out process has ended and a winning of an appeal has occurred then some cases maybe completely retried. Sometimes an appellate court may decide that some of the elements of the case that has been reexamined, shouldn’t have even been within the trial at...

Words: 888 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Ky Courts of Appeals

...Kentucky Court Of Appeals No.2011-CA-000187 (On appeal Jefferson Circuit Court, No.2011-CR-000187) Justin Meyers V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky Brief of Appellant, Justin Meyers Brittney H. Moran Moran Law Office 920 Samuel Street, Suite10210 Louisville, Kentucky 40204 Certificate of Service Undersigned certifies that the copy of this Brief of Appellant has been served by first class mail, on Sherry D. Hall, Counsel for the commonwealth Of Kentucky at 600 Market Street, Suite 1002 and Jake M. Moore, Clerk of Jefferson Circuit Court, at 700 West Jefferson Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202. “INTRODUCTION” This is an appeal of ruling on suppression motion. Appellate was tried by a jury and found guilty of possession of a controlled substance, drug paraphernalia, and first degree murder. Appellate appeals a ruling to allow a motion to suppress evidence found during the search warrant, stating the bloody handkerchief was illegally seized which subsequently led him to being charged with murder. A”STATEMENT CONCERING ORAL ARGUMENT” Appellant request that there no oral arguments because the issues presented in this case are not complex and the court will not benefit from the ability to question counsel. A”STATEMENT OF THE CASE” On November 16, 2010, a search warrant was served to have the premises at24870 Lake View Place Apartment 17, Centerville, searched. This apartment was suspected to be occupied by the defendant. The search warrant allowed law enforcement...

Words: 1595 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Teacher vs. Student Cases with Analysis

...for Teachers . Submitted to: Professor Rodrigo Duque Submitted by: Abbie Irish M. Mendoza III-2 BECEd G.R. No. L-39275 December 20, 1933 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. RICARDO MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellee. In criminal case No. 4851 of the Court of First Instance of Pampanga, the provincial fiscal thereof filed an information against the herein appellee, which reads as follows: The undersigned provincial fiscal accuses Ricardo Mendoza of the crime of assault upon a person in authority committed as follows:chanrobles virtual law library That on or about September 30,1932, in the municipality of San Fernando, Province of Pampanga, Philippine Islands, the said accused, Ricardo Mendoza, being a pupil of the teacher Iluminada Tinio, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally attack and lay hands upon her person, to wit: slapped said Iluminada Tinio on one of her cheeks, while she was engaged in the performance of her duties as such teacher and while she was within the premises of the high school building exercising the functions inherent in such capacity. Upon motion of the appellee, as accused in the aforesaid case, the trial court dismissed the information on the ground that the facts alleged therein did not constitute a crime but simply a misdemeanor or light felony. The present appeal was taken by the fiscal for the purpose of setting aside the order of dismissal in......

Words: 7409 - Pages: 30