Premium Essay

Emile Durkheim

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By millerson
Words 1798
Pages 8
AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY DIPLOMA IN SOCIAL WORK AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

COURSE CODE: SWD112

COURSE TITLE: INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY

QUESTION PICK ANY SOCIOLOGY FOUNDING FATHER, WRITE HIS OR HER CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIOLOGY

BY

HEZEKIAH KELLY .M.O. D12SG0016

DATE: JUNE 2013

EMILE DAVID DURKHEIM (1858 – 1917)
BRIEF HISTORY AND EARLY LIFE STAGES OF DURKHEIM Durkheim was born in the eastern Pascoag providence of Lorraine, which at that time was part of Germany, on April 15th 1858. He came from a long line of conservative French Jews but, he decided early in his life he would not follow in his family’s footsteps. He led a completely secular lifestyle. he never completely detached himself from his family or the Jewish community. Many of his colleagues and students were either from the Jewish community or of blood relation. In 1879 Durkheim entered École Normale Supérieure, as a very promising student. That year’s class was one of the most brilliant in the nineteenth century. Many of his classmates, such as Jean Jaurès and Henri Bergson, went on to become very influential to France’s history. Very early in his career, Durkheim became interested in the scientific approach to society by reading works by social scientists, Herbert Spencer and Auguste Comte, and studying with Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges. Thus, he found many problems with the French Academic System, because they had no social science curriculum. After studying social science at a University in Germany, he traveled to Bordeaux in 1887 for a teaching position. There, he occupied a position teaching pedagogy and one of the few positions as a Social Science teacher. From his teaching position he slowly introduced the idea of Social Science becoming a curriculum to the…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Durkheim and Marx

...4 February 2013 Durkheim and Marx Throughout time sociology has been created and built upon. It has been edited and revised over and over again and even though there’s more that needs to be worked on and more bricks to be added, some credit has to be given to two of the many people who laid the first bricks, Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim. Knowing each one of their point of views is important to understand them and how they are similar and how they differ. Marx focused on class division and how it shapes society. He focused on the business aspects and how children grow up to be like their parents. If a child is born into a family who lives off welfare, then they are most likely going to be on welfare. Marx opinion on the working class was as quoted in the article, written by Shaun Best, “Working-class people are said to hold values, ideas and beliefs about the nature of inequality.” (49). He states that the more money a person has, the more power they have in a society. He found that they separate themselves from other classes. Durkheim didn’t just focus on the business aspects but took it further out on the people. Durkheim was a functionalist. “Durkheim argued that we should treat social facts as things.” (Best) (17). That quote means we need to study sociology as if it were an object we can dissect. The working class makes up 99% of the society and people have the choices to conform or not to conform to the ways of the society. He really studied suicide and the...

Words: 468 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

“Contributions Made by Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim to the Research Methodology Used in Social Sciences”

...RESPONSE PAPER “Contributions made by KARL MARX, MAX WEBER and EMILE DURKHEIM to the research methodology used in social sciences” INTRODUCTION The paper mainly concerns the contributions of MARX, WEBER and DURKHEIM to the methodology in social sciences. The various methodologies in social sciences establish a connection with the societal implications which have a large impact over the society and its normative effects. Referring to the contributions by the following sociologists, all have a different and influential impact on the factors of society. The methodology of various sociologists reflects their attitude towards the society and its various customs and traditions. The following mentioned are the various methodologies adopted by sociologists in the field of social sciences. Marxist sociology emerged around late 19th/early 20th century, influenced by the thought of Karl Marx. Marx is seen as one of the most influential thinkers in early sociology, alongside thinkers such as Max Weber and Émile Durkheim. KARL MARX The theory propounded by Karl Marx is Marxism; in a nutshell it is the theory and practice of working-class emancipation. Marxism is also a method of looking at the world. One of the most important foundations of Marx's method was dialectical thought. Marx relied a lot on historical materialism and dialecticism to propound his theories in social science. Marx relied heavily on these two......

Words: 1776 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Durkheims Theory of Division of Labour

...Society” Durkheim tried to determine the social consequences of the division of labour in modern societies. A major theme in all Durkheim’s writings is the importance of shared social norms and values in maintaining social cohesion and solidarity. He argued that the nature of this social solidarity depends on the extent of the division of labour. Meaning of Division of Labour: The concept of “Division of Labour” has been used in three ways: (i) in the sense of the technical division of labour, it describes the production process; (ii) as the sexual division of labour, it describes social divisions between men and women; (iii) as the social division of labour, it refers to differentiation in society as a whole. [It is in the third sense that Durkheim uses this term.] In a general sense, the term division of labour involves the assignment to each unit or group a specific share of a common task. As used by the early classical economists such as Adam Smith (1776), the term describes a specialisation in workshops and the factory system, and explains the advantages accruing in terms of the increased efficiency and productivity from these new arrangements? Durkheim’s Optimistic View of Division of Labour: “While Marx was pessimistic about the division of labour in society, Durkheim was cautiously optimistic. Marx saw the specialised division of labour trapping the worker in his occupational role and dividing society into antagonistic social classes.......

Words: 1936 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Consider Emile Durkheim’s Approach to the Study of Suicide. Why Does He Associate Egoistic Suicide with Modern Society and Altruistic Suicide with Pre-Modern Suicide?

...Consider Emile Durkheim’s approach to the study of suicide. Why does he associate egoistic suicide with modern society and altruistic suicide with pre-modern suicide? Emile Durkheim goes to great lengths in this article to describe the many different types of suicide and how they affect society. He believes that social influences have a large part to play with suicide rates in different countries. He looks to take the matter away from the individual and focus on how and why suicide rates among different classes, genders, and age groups are similar throughout different countries. Durkheim goes on to discuss the different reasons why people may commit suicide. These include people been over- integrated into society or altruistic suicide, under integrated into society or egotistic suicide, having too much moral regulation or fatalistic suicide and having too little moral regulation or anomic suicide. This assignment will discuss all these different factors and will comment on why Durkheim associates different types of suicide to different types of suicide. Durkheim defines suicide as “The term suicide is applied to all cases of death resulting directly or indirectly from a positive or a negative act of the victim himself, which he knows will produce this result” (E. Durkheim, suicide: A Study in Sociology, pg 214). A positive action like shooting or stabbing oneself is the same as refusing to eat food knowing that you will die as a direct result of your actions or non actions...

Words: 1319 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Paul Verlaine Emile Nelligan

...Plan de la dissertation IP1Nous observons dans les deux textes divers points communs dont le rêve et le désir de trouver l’amour. IS1 Dans les deux poèmes, nous avons la récurrence du rêve. * Verlaine : vers « Je fais souvent ce rêve étrange et pénétrant» (v.1) ainsi que le titre « Mon rêve Familier » * Nelligan : nous retrouvons la métaphore «Je ne puis l'approcher qu'en des vapeurs de rêve.» (v.6) IS2 Les deux poètes aspire à trouver cet amour exceptionnel qui comblera leur solitude. * Verlaine : La métaphore «Car elle me comprend, et mon cœur transparent.» ainsi que la répétition de « Elle seule » (v. 6, 7 et 8) * Nelligan : la personnification «Et moi qui le recherche ainsi, noble et subtil.» IP2 Bien que nous retrouvons divers similitudes marquants, nous pouvant retirer tout autant de divergences importantes dont la perception de la femme rêvée. IS1  Chez Verlaine la femme est une figure inconnue qui pourrait prendre n’importe quelle forme tandis que Nelligan a déjà bâtit une idée plus spécifique * Verlaine : la phrase interrogative «Est-elle brune, blonde ou rousse?» et le parallélisme «ni tout à fait la même, ni tout à fait une autre » (v.3 et 4) * Nelligan : le parallélisme «Elle est hautaine et belle, et moi timide et laid» (v. 5) IS2- Verlaine est plongé dans un rêve doux où la femme en question éprouve le même sentiment que le poète tandis que Nelligan se souffre de l’ignorance de la femme de ses rêves. *......

Words: 415 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Durkheim Religion

...Durkheim on Religion “If religion has given birth to all that is essential in society, it is because the idea of society is the soul of religion." (Bellah, 1973, p. 191 [excerpt from The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life]) "For we know today that a religion does not necessarily imply symbols and rites, properly speaking, or temples and priests. This whole exterior apparatus is only the superficial part. Essentially, it is nothing other than a body of collective beliefs and practices endowed with a certain authority." (1973, p. 51 [excerpt from "Individualism and the Intellectuals"]) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, the last major work published by Durkheim, five years before his death in 1917, is generally regarded as his best and most mature. Where Suicide focused on a large amount of statistics from varying sources, The Elementary Forms used one case study in depth, the Australian aborigines. Durkheim chose this group because he felt they represented the most basic, elementary forms of religion within a culture. Durkheim set out to do two things, establish the fact that religion was not divinely or supernaturally inspired and was in fact a product of society, and he sought to identify the common things that religion placed an emphasis upon, as well as what effects those religious beliefs (the product of social life) had on the lives of all within a society. Durkheim's finding that religion was social can best be described by this excerpt...

Words: 1263 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Emile Durkheim

...Topic 2: Emile Durkheim Many company and corporate advertisements celebrate the values of community, such as this one from Starbucks (NYT Magazine 12/17/07, p. 83). It states: Community: “People you share space with, some that you know and some that you don’t. Your lives have a common thread, a tie that binds, whether it’s where you live or beliefs you have or the fact that you give when they need. Yes, it can be as simple as that.” Discuss how this Starbucks advertisement captures the different meanings of community associated with Durkheim’s concepts of mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Find additional examples that illustrate the value of community as both a local and a global phenomenon. Solidarity refers to the integration amongst groups of people and neighbors within society due to social ties that may arise from common responsibilities and interests. Social bonds are created between people from these communal ties which revolves around the principles of shared morals, values, kinship and association. According to Durkheim without the smooth correspondence of morality and social organization to form a properly functioning society through social cohesion and adaption social ties will be nonexistent hence creating anomie. This essay will be covering both mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity, showing the differences and overlapping factors in relation to the Starbucks advertisement. Following Durkheim's concept of mechanical solidarity and......

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Karl Marx vs Emile Durkheim: a Comparison

...Introduction This essay intends to explicitly compare Karl Marx and Emile David Durkheim ideas on religion from a sociological and functionalist perspective. Functionalists’ belief that religion is beneficial for both the community and its members e.g. it unifies the society which in turn gives each individual member a source of support when they need it. It will begin with their brief historical backgrounds, definition of religion as well as their similarities and differences in studying it. Karl Marx Marx was born in Prussia on May 5, 1818. He began exploring sociopolitical theories at university among the Young Hegelians. He became a journalist, and his socialist writings would get him expelled from Germany and France. In 1848, he published The Communist Manifesto with Friedrich Engels and was exiled to London, where he wrote the first volume of Das Kapital and lived the remainder of his life (Engels, 1869). Marx is considered as one of the founders of economic history and sociology. Emile Durkheim According to Jones (1986) “David Emile Durkheim was born in France, on April 15, 1857 and raised in a Jewish family with his father as a rabbi. Emile was, thus destined for the rabbinate, and a part of his early education was spent in a rabbinical school” (p.12). Durkheim is considered the father of modern sociology and well known for his work on Division of Labour in 1912. Definition of Religion Both Marx and Durkheim have rather contrasting definitions of what religion......

Words: 2029 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Analyzing Emile Durkheim and Clifford Geertz's Definition of Religion

...In attempting to answer the ominous and age-old issue of what religion is, Emile Durkheim and Clifford Geertz offer two quite in-depth and distinct definitions that can be viewed as very similar, yet truly different on a number of levels. In this essay, I will examine the similarities and differences between the two authors’ definitions of religion and offer my own perspective on each. Both anthropologists provide definitions that share the emphasis on religion as specific to a people, and also share the acknowledgement of rituals or practices within religion. However, Durkheim and Geertz have different fundamental, explicit concepts of religion, and in turn emphasize different aspects of religion and its social function. Many critiques on both definitions have provided a number of pros and cons to each, which in turn have led to my preference of one over the other. In examining the similarities between Durkheim and Geertz’s definitions of religion, one must observe that both authors conceptualize religion as specific to the group of people that it is present in, with limited applications outside of the group. At the heart of Emile Durkheim’s definition of religion is the concept that religion is central to society and that “religion is an eminently social thing” (DURKHEIM 2008: 39). Embedded in this idea of religion as a social entity is the concept of religion as socially-specific; as applicable only to the specific group it exists in. He goes on to claim that beliefs and...

Words: 1588 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Durkheim on Suicide and Feminism

...suicide versus homicide. Suicide and interpersonal violence are leading health issues among adolescent Americans. Suicide is the third leading cause of death among people ages 15-24 and 10-14, although suicide rates have declined over the years. Durkheim focuses on social forces in regards to suicide, specifically social integration and moral regulation on human behavior. The text also states that the role of religion on suicidal behaviors is also neglected. Durkheim argues that suicide is a social fact and can be described using sociological terms and methods. He insists that “suicide rates increase when there are deficient integration and regulation functions within religious, familial and political group” (page 923). He emphasizes the importance of integration, especially as an important function for youth behavior. Durkheim also covers school factors and points out that schools are important institutions in adolescent life, including involvement in school activities and valuing education. Weak bonds to schools can alienate adolescents and increase the likelihood of suicide. There is a pattern of this type of thought in Durkheim’s work. Weak bonds to religion and religious institutions have a similar effect. According to Durkheim, religion is a product of society, a communal phenomenon and commitment to collective norms, traditions and values. Religion leads to less self-destructive behavior and less chances of suicide. Ties to positive institutions promote......

Words: 637 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Deviance

...Crime, a Normal Element in the Society Sociologists like Emile Durkheim are more concerned with the study of deviance. Emile Durkheim’s ideas, concepts, and issues are traced, which provides explanations to why he says crime should be considered as a normal element in the society. Functionalism is one of the sociological theories that focus on issues of crime. A functionalist analyzes deviance from a societal point of view rather than the psychological nature of a person or the existing biological explanations. According to Durkheim, crime should be considered as a regular element in the society. He conquered to the consensus and social order of the society about criminal issues (Hawdon, Ryan & Agnich, 2010). His belief was that crime is not an evitable but a typical aspect of social life in different types of societies. He views it as an integral part that ensures the well-being of society. He argues that not all members of a community are equal (Durkheim, 2013). Each is influenced differently according to different circumstances he or she faces. This leads to unequal reluctance in law breaking. Durkheim is a positivist functionalist and clearly points out the reasons for why he says crime should be considered as a regular element in the society. He argues that crime should be regarded as functional and something necessary for a society but not something pathological (Hawdon, Ryan & Agnich, 2010). He says that crime is present in almost every society since each......

Words: 848 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Durkheim on Solidarity

...Durkheim on solidarity Of all the things I’ve learned about from researching Durkheim’s thoughts and ideas, the most striking one were the ones which surrounded social solidarity. To put it simply, social solidarity is a set of norms, values and morals that hold a certain group of people together. He described it as a “wholly moral phenomenon which by itself is not amenable to exact observation and especially not to measurement” (Durkheim 1997). Durkheim believed that there were two types of solidarity, Mechanical and Organic Mechanical solidarity, despite what one might guess from its name, describes the social integration of members of a society who are connected by their homogeneity of beliefs, values and lifestyle. The defining aspect of mechanical solidarity is its collective consciousness. The group acts as one, all actions in unison. “All we require is for the functions to work together in a regular fashion” (Durkheim 1997). In this type of society it is often found that individuality is moderately or sometimes harshly discouraged and is usually punished by the group. Durkheim states that “the more intensity of punishment is the greater the more closely societies approximate to a less developed type- and the more the central power assumes an absolute character” (Tiryakian 1964). These types of societies are usually found in rural villages and other less developed communities. Organic solidarity is a slightly more modern version of solidarity that is born from the......

Words: 854 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Classical Theory Durkheim

...the latter that emerged from the former” (Durkheim in McIntosh 1997:197). This might be hard to understand because we are an individually motivated society, but what Durkheim is saying is that individual life occurs as a result of the collective life, that society is not made up of individuals. Through theories based on observation, society is treated as a fact. Each person has a function in order to keep society together. Durkheim calls this the Sociological Method, and explains this method through social facts. These social facts are the collective phenomena existing independent of us individually. Collective conscience is spread throughout society delivering solidarity through common beliefs. With everyone playing a role Durkheim is telling us that everyone is necessary. People end up doing things in relation to one another and act on their duties and roles such as a citizen. What drives the individual to conform with the rest of society are the social forces outside of them. It is instilled in us to pay attention to the patterns in society. The degree to which an individual is a part of society tells us about their social integration, whereas the degree of an their actions and wants are controlled by their society tells us about their social regulation. Durkheim uses social integration and social regulation throughout his study of suicide to describe the four types, egoistic, altruistic, anomic, and fatalistic. (Durkheim in McIntosh 1997:214) “Suicide is......

Words: 1432 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Durkheim Did Not Say “Normlessness”

...SOUTHERN RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 24(1), 2009, pp. 200–222. Copyright © by the Southern Rural Sociological Association DURKHEIM DID NOT SAY “NORMLESSNESS”: THE CONCEPT OF ANOMIC SUICIDE FOR INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY COURSES PHYLLIS PUFFER BIG SANDY COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE ABSTRACT The definitions of anomic suicide presented in introductory sociology textbooks from 1996 to 2007 were compared with the definition given by Durkheim in his own writings both in the original French and the English translation. It was found that only one textbook correctly gave Durkheim’s own definition while the other definitions showed little or no relationship to the original concept. The original concept was based on an analysis of the economy, more particularly the business cycle, and refers only to the structure of society and not to the mental state of the individual. An attempt is made to discover the source of such a widespread and well-accepted error. All of us are concerned about the introductory course in sociology, no matter the august reaches of academe we might have attained. Nearly all of us have taught it at least once, if only as teaching assistants during our graduate school days. Some of us always teach it. The rest depend on it as a basis for their advanced courses, for a supply of research assistants, and ultimately to build public appreciation and support for the field. If we think of the number of students who take introductory sociology in just one......

Words: 8240 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay

Emile

...Emile Test Explain Rousseau’s view on the doctrine of original sin and man’s basic nature. The definition of original sin states that human’s are born evil and must walk a strict path to redemption to achieve a higher order and connection with God. Rousseau disagrees with the doctrine of original sin and, instead, believes that man is born with the intent to do good and can be easily corrupted if educated poorly. Rousseau argued that institutions of society corrupted humans and that society prompted selfishness, weakness, and arrogance in a child’s development. To counteract this negative path, Rousseau advocates that children be taught to connect with the world through emotion and empathy (learning by experience). By doing this, a child is able to explore the world, make mistakes, and learn from these same mistakes, transforming him into a symbol of good. To support the learning by experience method, Rousseau believes that a child should learn from natural consequence, which are inevitable. This means that if a child did something wrong, a teacher or parent should let him or her suffer for her actions as punishment. For example, in Emile the main character is assigned to do chores around the house. When he fails to complete his tasks, he is unable to receive food of any kind. Rousseau also believes that a child should expand their world through emersion rather than through reading. Reading, Rousseau feels, confines a child to a limited set of rules and gives a recount of......

Words: 282 - Pages: 2