Free Essay

Be Good

In: Other Topics

Submitted By harshitha7
Words 3046
Pages 13
About a month after we started Y Combinator we came up with the phrase that became our motto: Make something people want. We've learned a lot since then, but if I were choosing now that's still the one I'd pick.

Another thing we tell founders is not to worry too much about the business model, at least at first. Not because making money is unimportant, but because it's so much easier than building something great.

A couple weeks ago I realized that if you put those two ideas together, you get something surprising. Make something people want. Don't worry too much about making money. What you've got is a description of a charity.

When you get an unexpected result like this, it could either be a bug or a new discovery. Either businesses aren't supposed to be like charities, and we've proven by reductio ad absurdum that one or both of the principles we began with is false. Or we have a new idea.

I suspect it's the latter, because as soon as this thought occurred to me, a whole bunch of other things fell into place.


For example, Craigslist. It's not a charity, but they run it like one. And they're astoundingly successful. When you scan down the list of most popular web sites, the number of employees at Craigslist looks like a misprint. Their revenues aren't as high as they could be, but most startups would be happy to trade places with them.

In Patrick O'Brian's novels, his captains always try to get upwind of their opponents. If you're upwind, you decide when and if to engage the other ship. Craigslist is effectively upwind of enormous revenues. They'd face some challenges if they wanted to make more, but not the sort you face when you're tacking upwind, trying to force a crappy product on ambivalent users by spending ten times as much on sales as on development. [1]

I'm not saying startups should aim to end up like Craigslist. They're a product of unusual circumstances. But they're a good model for the early phases.

Google looked a lot like a charity in the beginning. They didn't have ads for over a year. At year 1, Google was indistinguishable from a nonprofit. If a nonprofit or government organization had started a project to index the web, Google at year 1 is the limit of what they'd have produced.

Back when I was working on spam filters I thought it would be a good idea to have a web-based email service with good spam filtering. I wasn't thinking of it as a company. I just wanted to keep people from getting spammed. But as I thought more about this project, I realized it would probably have to be a company. It would cost something to run, and it would be a pain to fund with grants and donations.

That was a surprising realization. Companies often claim to be benevolent, but it was surprising to realize there were purely benevolent projects that had to be embodied as companies to work.

I didn't want to start another company, so I didn't do it. But if someone had, they'd probably be quite rich now. There was a window of about two years when spam was increasing rapidly but all the big email services had terrible filters. If someone had launched a new, spam-free mail service, users would have flocked to it.

Notice the pattern here? From either direction we get to the same spot. If you start from successful startups, you find they often behaved like nonprofits. And if you start from ideas for nonprofits, you find they'd often make good startups.


How wide is this territory? Would all good nonprofits be good companies? Possibly not. What makes Google so valuable is that their users have money. If you make people with money love you, you can probably get some of it. But could you also base a successful startup on behaving like a nonprofit to people who don't have money? Could you, for example, grow a successful startup out of curing an unfashionable but deadly disease like malaria?

I'm not sure, but I suspect that if you pushed this idea, you'd be surprised how far it would go. For example, people who apply to Y Combinator don't generally have much money, and yet we can profit by helping them, because with our help they could make money. Maybe the situation is similar with malaria. Maybe an organization that helped lift its weight off a country could benefit from the resulting growth.

I'm not proposing this is a serious idea. I don't know anything about malaria. But I've been kicking ideas around long enough to know when I come across a powerful one.

One way to guess how far an idea extends is to ask yourself at what point you'd bet against it. The thought of betting against benevolence is alarming in the same way as saying that something is technically impossible. You're just asking to be made a fool of, because these are such powerful forces. [2]

For example, initially I thought maybe this principle only applied to Internet startups. Obviously it worked for Google, but what about Microsoft? Surely Microsoft isn't benevolent? But when I think back to the beginning, they were. Compared to IBM they were like Robin Hood. When IBM introduced the PC, they thought they were going to make money selling hardware at high prices. But by gaining control of the PC standard, Microsoft opened up the market to any manufacturer. Hardware prices plummeted, and lots of people got to have computers who couldn't otherwise have afforded them. It's the sort of thing you'd expect Google to do.

Microsoft isn't so benevolent now. Now when one thinks of what Microsoft does to users, all the verbs that come to mind begin with F. [3] And yet it doesn't seem to pay. Their stock price has been flat for years. Back when they were Robin Hood, their stock price rose like Google's. Could there be a connection?

You can see how there would be. When you're small, you can't bully customers, so you have to charm them. Whereas when you're big you can maltreat them at will, and you tend to, because it's easier than satisfying them. You grow big by being nice, but you can stay big by being mean.

You get away with it till the underlying conditions change, and then all your victims escape. So "Don't be evil" may be the most valuable thing Paul Buchheit made for Google, because it may turn out to be an elixir of corporate youth. I'm sure they find it constraining, but think how valuable it will be if it saves them from lapsing into the fatal laziness that afflicted Microsoft and IBM.

The curious thing is, this elixir is freely available to any other company. Anyone can adopt "Don't be evil." The catch is that people will hold you to it. So I don't think you're going to see record labels or tobacco companies using this discovery.


There's a lot of external evidence that benevolence works. But how does it work? One advantage of investing in a large number of startups is that you get a lot of data about how they work. From what we've seen, being good seems to help startups in three ways: it improves their morale, it makes other people want to help them, and above all, it helps them be decisive.

Morale is tremendously important to a startup—so important that morale alone is almost enough to determine success. Startups are often described as emotional roller-coasters. One minute you're going to take over the world, and the next you're doomed. The problem with feeling you're doomed is not just that it makes you unhappy, but that it makes you stop working. So the downhills of the roller-coaster are more of a self fulfilling prophecy than the uphills. If feeling you're going to succeed makes you work harder, that probably improves your chances of succeeding, but if feeling you're going to fail makes you stop working, that practically guarantees you'll fail.

Here's where benevolence comes in. If you feel you're really helping people, you'll keep working even when it seems like your startup is doomed. Most of us have some amount of natural benevolence. The mere fact that someone needs you makes you want to help them. So if you start the kind of startup where users come back each day, you've basically built yourself a giant tamagotchi. You've made something you need to take care of.

Blogger is a famous example of a startup that went through really low lows and survived. At one point they ran out of money and everyone left. Evan Williams came in to work the next day, and there was no one but him. What kept him going? Partly that users needed him. He was hosting thousands of people's blogs. He couldn't just let the site die.

There are many advantages of launching quickly, but the most important may be that once you have users, the tamagotchi effect kicks in. Once you have users to take care of, you're forced to figure out what will make them happy, and that's actually very valuable information.

The added confidence that comes from trying to help people can also help you with investors. One of the founders of Chatterous told me recently that he and his cofounder had decided that this service was something the world needed, so they were going to keep working on it no matter what, even if they had to move back to Canada and live in their parents' basements.

Once they realized this, they stopped caring so much what investors thought about them. They still met with them, but they weren't going to die if they didn't get their money. And you know what? The investors got a lot more interested. They could sense that the Chatterouses were going to do this startup with or without them.

If you're really committed and your startup is cheap to run, you become very hard to kill. And practically all startups, even the most successful, come close to death at some point. So if doing good for people gives you a sense of mission that makes you harder to kill, that alone more than compensates for whatever you lose by not choosing a more selfish project.


Another advantage of being good is that it makes other people want to help you. This too seems to be an inborn trait in humans.

One of the startups we've funded, Octopart, is currently locked in a classic battle of good versus evil. They're a search site for industrial components. A lot of people need to search for components, and before Octopart there was no good way to do it. That, it turned out, was no coincidence.

Octopart built the right way to search for components. Users like it and they've been growing rapidly. And yet for most of Octopart's life, the biggest distributor, Digi-Key, has been trying to force them take their prices off the site. Octopart is sending them customers for free, and yet Digi-Key is trying to make that traffic stop. Why? Because their current business model depends on overcharging people who have incomplete information about prices. They don't want search to work.

The Octoparts are the nicest guys in the world. They dropped out of the PhD program in physics at Berkeley to do this. They just wanted to fix a problem they encountered in their research. Imagine how much time you could save the world's engineers if they could do searches online. So when I hear that a big, evil company is trying to stop them in order to keep search broken, it makes me really want to help them. It makes me spend more time on the Octoparts than I do with most of the other startups we've funded. It just made me spend several minutes telling you how great they are. Why? Because they're good guys and they're trying to help the world.

If you're benevolent, people will rally around you: investors, customers, other companies, and potential employees. In the long term the most important may be the potential employees. I think everyone knows now that good hackers are much better than mediocre ones. If you can attract the best hackers to work for you, as Google has, you have a big advantage. And the very best hackers tend to be idealistic. They're not desperate for a job. They can work wherever they want. So most want to work on things that will make the world better.


But the most important advantage of being good is that it acts as a compass. One of the hardest parts of doing a startup is that you have so many choices. There are just two or three of you, and a thousand things you could do. How do you decide?

Here's the answer: Do whatever's best for your users. You can hold onto this like a rope in a hurricane, and it will save you if anything can. Follow it and it will take you through everything you need to do.

It's even the answer to questions that seem unrelated, like how to convince investors to give you money. If you're a good salesman, you could try to just talk them into it. But the more reliable route is to convince them through your users: if you make something users love enough to tell their friends, you grow exponentially, and that will convince any investor.

Being good is a particularly useful strategy for making decisions in complex situations because it's stateless. It's like telling the truth. The trouble with lying is that you have to remember everything you've said in the past to make sure you don't contradict yourself. If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything, and that's a really useful property in domains where things happen fast.

For example, Y Combinator has now invested in 80 startups, 57 of which are still alive. (The rest have died or merged or been acquired.) When you're trying to advise 57 startups, it turns out you have to have a stateless algorithm. You can't have ulterior motives when you have 57 things going on at once, because you can't remember them. So our rule is just to do whatever's best for the founders. Not because we're particularly benevolent, but because it's the only algorithm that works on that scale.

When you write something telling people to be good, you seem to be claiming to be good yourself. So I want to say explicitly that I am not a particularly good person. When I was a kid I was firmly in the camp of bad. The way adults used the word good, it seemed to be synonymous with quiet, so I grew up very suspicious of it.

You know how there are some people whose names come up in conversation and everyone says "He's such a great guy?" People never say that about me. The best I get is "he means well." I am not claiming to be good. At best I speak good as a second language.

So I'm not suggesting you be good in the usual sanctimonious way. I'm suggesting it because it works. It will work not just as a statement of "values," but as a guide to strategy, and even a design spec for software. Don't just not be evil. Be good.


[1] Fifty years ago it would have seemed shocking for a public company not to pay dividends. Now many tech companies don't. The markets seem to have figured out how to value potential dividends. Maybe that isn't the last step in this evolution. Maybe markets will eventually get comfortable with potential earnings. (VCs already are, and at least some of them consistently make money.)

I realize this sounds like the stuff one used to hear about the "new economy" during the Bubble. Believe me, I was not drinking that kool-aid at the time. But I'm convinced there were some good ideas buried in Bubble thinking. For example, it's ok to focus on growth instead of profits—but only if the growth is genuine. You can't be buying users; that's a pyramid scheme. But a company with rapid, genuine growth is valuable, and eventually markets learn how to value valuable things.

[2] The idea of starting a company with benevolent aims is currently undervalued, because the kind of people who currently make that their explicit goal don't usually do a very good job.

It's one of the standard career paths of trustafarians to start some vaguely benevolent business. The problem with most of them is that they either have a bogus political agenda or are feebly executed. The trustafarians' ancestors didn't get rich by preserving their traditional culture; maybe people in Bolivia don't want to either. And starting an organic farm, though it's at least straightforwardly benevolent, doesn't help people on the scale that Google does.

Most explicitly benevolent projects don't hold themselves sufficiently accountable. They act as if having good intentions were enough to guarantee good effects.

[3] Users dislike their new operating system so much that they're starting petitions to save the old one. And the old one was nothing special. The hackers within Microsoft must know in their hearts that if the company really cared about users they'd just advise them to switch to OSX.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay


...companies on a daily basis. The governments mention the topic about innovation increasingly and frequently (Swedish Government, 2008). Different authors defines innovation differently and classifies innovation in various types. The Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter (1934), a pioneer of innovation management, described innovation as “creative destruction”- a new association of production factors and production conditions. Schumpeter defined innovation from five aspects: The introduction of a new goods – which customers are not familiar yet, or a new quality of a goods. The introduction of a new method of production, which not only means new technology, but also means a new way of handling a commodity commercially. The opening of a new market. New market does not just mean the markets which never existed before, it also means the markets which already exists but enterprises have not entered previously. Finding a new source of supply of raw materials or half-manufactured goods. Like new market, new source means both the source which has first to be created and the source which has existed but has not been used before. The carrying out of the new organization of any industry, like create a monopoly position or break up a monopoly position. Although more than 70 years has past after Schumpeter presented his innovation theory, it can be seen as a basic theory of innovation and has its own rationality to be widely known. Later, people summarized......

Words: 1162 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...mentor who fails a student will inevitably be scrutinised by the examination board and therefore an accurate, clear and well-evidenced report is essential. Support from lecturing staff who are familiar with the process of writing up the clinical assessment was seen as vital by participants in the study in order that a ‘watertight’ report could be written. Another way in which lecturers provided support was being present at the final meeting of the mentor and the student. It was evident from participants in the study that this tripartite arrangement was not established in each programme. Where procedure indicated that the lecturer be present at the final assessment this was seen as supportive, as this mentor points out: ‘But the tutor was quite good, coming in as well, you know… I just remember feeling very uncomfortable and as I say, it was nice to have some support’. (Participant 4M) Not all universities appeared to have protocols that included the link lecturer’s presence at the final assessment, as one of the lecturer’s comments: ‘…if it’s a fail, and there’s very few I’ve got to say, then we would expect to be aware previously and I would expect each link person to go out for the final assessment. But, we haven't got a, got anything written that that’s the case’. (Participant 23L) As indicated in Chapter 1 the literature has advocated for some time that lecturers should have a shared role with mentors in the clinical assessment of students (Clifford 1994, May et al 1997,......

Words: 27166 - Pages: 109

Premium Essay

Good anyone who attends school, college, or university. Today’s students are tomorrow’s leaders, and their qualities clearly determine their future. Who is a good student? What are the qualities of a good student? Based on my personal experience and research, I list below the qualities of a good student: (1) Attitude: Basically, a good student possesses the ability and willingness to learn new subjects even if they are not interesting. (2) Academic skills: Acquiring academic skills is the most important quality of a good student. The ability to read comprehensively, to write effectively, to speak fluently, and to communicate clearly are the key areas in which a good student must be proficient. Having skills in all these areas will make a student shine in class. (3) Ability: A good student has the ability to apply the results of his or her learning in a creative way and achieve goals. (4) Perceptiveness: How well a student can interpret and perceive meanings from a conversation greatly determines the quality of a good student. A good student always perceives the right meaning from a conversation, but an average student often misunderstands the original thoughts of the speaker or writer and derives a wrong conclusion. (5) Self-Discipline: Discipline in managing time is an important ability that every good student must possess. Delaying tasks, such as writing assignments, reading text books, etc, may negatively impact the ability of a student to achieve his or......

Words: 320 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...8—Personal Financial Information: Please complete only items 41A and 44. For 41A, if either parent is a government or military officer, give current grade/rank or grade/rank at which retired. Page 9—University Preference: You are not required to state the university preferences, but if you would like, please complete this page as fully as possible. Do not just list the name of a university in which you are interested. Be specific. Provide the name of the department and the specific program within that department in which you are interested. If you have been in contact or correspondence with a faculty member, please provide the name and contact information for that individual. Most important is to explain why you think that the university is a good fit for you. If you have applied to a U.S. university within the past three years, please list the programs and the results. If you have letters of admission, letters of invitation, or other correspondence from a school, especially a preferred program, please forward a copy (not the original) of this correspondence to USEFP. SUPPLEMENTAL FORMS a. Letter of Reference/Recommendation: You must have three letters of reference (or recommendation) submitted on your behalf. Letters of reference are extremely important. All letters of reference should be written by teachers under whom you have studied or pursued research or by someone who has supervised you in work related to your proposed field of study. Letters of reference......

Words: 4997 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay


...largest and most you can hold out for evidence? on sale for only $5, but franchise profitable banks in Canada, testing is so According to the author, the best owners worried that the promotion well established that occasionally manway to support decision making on would lure existing customers away potential innovations is to… agers are reminded that, in the interests from higher-priced menu items. An experiment pitting test sites of speed, they can make the call with» Design an experiment. against control sites proved that the out a test when they have a great deal Start with a hypothesis about how promotion would pay off – which it of experience in the relevant business the change will help the business. subsequently did. domain. If it’s a good one, you’ll learn as much by disproving it as you would Generally speaking, the triumphs of by proving it. Put it to the test by testing occur in strategy execution, not » Make testing the norm. measuring what happens in a test strategy formulation. Whether in marCreate the training and infrastrucgroup versus a control group. From keting, store or branch location analyture that will enable nonexperts in the outset, be clear on what you sis, or website design, the most reliable statistics to oversee rigorous experineed to measure to produce a dements. Off-the-shelf software can insights relate to the potential impact cisive result – and whether that’s a walk them through the steps and and value of tactical changes: a new metric you......

Words: 5341 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay


...Chapter 2 Goods, Products and Services Glenn Parry, Linda Newnes, and Xiaoxi Huang 2.1 Introduction Defining terminology is a useful starting point when reading or writing on the subject of service to prevent any confusion or assumptions that we all understand the terms to mean the same thing. So, what do we mean by goods, products and services? This is a book about service, but what is a ‘service’ and how is it different to ‘goods’ or ‘products’? Whilst most people intuitively know the difference between a product and service, actually defining this difference with clarity and accuracy of text is not straight forward. The terms ‘goods’ and ‘products’ appear to be used interchangeably in much of the literature, but even here we can find debate about meaning (Araujo and Spring 2006; Callon 1991, 2002). However, for the sake of brevity we will here accept that they both refer to the same thing and focus on attempts to differentiate goods and services. This quest is far from straightforward. Since the early eighteenth century academics and scholars from different domains have attempted to define these terms explicitly (Say 1803; Levitt 1981; Hill 1999; Gadrey 2000). In this chapter we will attempt to illustrate their findings in order to provide some background to the debate. 2.2 Goods In the eighteenth century Adam Smith (1776) stated that goods have exchangeable value and so a characteristic of a good is that its ownership rights can be established and......

Words: 4321 - Pages: 18

Free Essay


...Define what "good" means to you. Being good does not mean only by outer goodness . You have to consider being good straight from the heart i.e purely . Ultimately, you have to decide on your own code of ethics, and what matters is that you follow through with what you believe makes you a good person. At times, this may conflict with what others believe is good, and they might even accuse you of being wrong or evil. Consider their views-either they know something you don't, in which case you may learn something from them and update your morality, or perhaps their experience is limited, meaning that you should take their views with a grain of salt. Ad Be Good Step 2.jpg 2Be good for its own sake. Don't try to be a good person because your parents told you to, because you want recognition or respect, or for any kind of reward except your own satisfaction in doing what you believe is good. Never act superior to anyone else or brag about your "goodness" or "righteousness". Your dedication to a particular creed, ideology, or set of guidelines does not make you better than anyone else. Do what you believe makes you a good person on your own terms, and remember that it's an individual journey-everyone's path is unique. Do good by stealth, and blush to find it fame.[1] Be Good Step 3.jpg 3Be proactive. It's tempting to infer that as long as you avoid doing the things you know are bad (stealing, badmouthing, lying, intentionally saying hurtful things, etc.), then that means......

Words: 1372 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Good’s performance in either a good or bad way. McDonald’s can be referred to the most successful restaurant chain in the restaurant and food industry especially with the number of franchises it has all around the world. First of all, smart companies are looking at many ways to harness technological factors to perfectly improve operations management. There are bunch of significant strategies where they can promote the goods and service to make production easier and more responsive to the public consumption. It’s no surprise that businesses of all shapes and sizes are bringing in technology to bolster sales (Robbins 2012). These advances have made an impact everywhere, and one of the places we’re seeing more and more technology is in the food and restaurant industry. The restaurants must have consistent touch points in order to attract an attention of the customers, in other ways its look and feel to communicate with the customer at different points of the journey and direction, from digital marketing, to people sitting at home and potential customers walking by a restaurant. Innovative technologies are exist as a service restaurant brands, with many concepts and background to employing digital menu boards such as how they ordering the goods and how they give a feedback of their services, the strategy and location of production, iPads at the table, and other ways of letting customers tap into technology while they are ordering the type of good and service. Some......

Words: 2710 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Good Will

...on Kant’s views on good will and moral worth, along with some real life examples, Socrates’s discussion on differences between mere true belief and real knowledge of virtue and several other philosophers’ unique interpretations and related discussions on this topic. Kant makes a clear argument about good will in the very beginning of his book Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. He explicitly states that: “There is no possibility of thinking anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which can be regarded as good without qualification, except a good will. (Kant 7)” Kant believes that a good will is always morally good. Therefore, what a good will does is always morally good as well. Also, he obviously takes good will as the only true standard to judge the moral worth of a certain action. He explains that everything that seems to be good by itself actually could only be good if they are driven by a good will; without a good will, these other things might be used to produce negative outcomes. Except for a good will, nothing else would be good simply on its own. For example, loyal soldiers with bravery driven by a good will protect the city and the citizens well, and some of them may even sacrifice their own lives for such honorable aims. But without a good will, bravery can be used by greedy robbers and may lead to terrible outcomes. Also, scientists may use intelligence with a good will to improve our lives in various aspects; without such good will,......

Words: 2916 - Pages: 12

Free Essay


... |      |      |      |      | |      |      |      |      |      | 3. Extra-curricular activities and interests Please give details of any extra-curricular activities and interests that you pursue in your free time which you feel support your application. We are interested in the skills and qualities you have gained from your extra-curricular activities, which you believe will make you a good student ambassador for the University.       …Maximum 500 words........... 4. Reference Please give the details of a referee e.g. a teacher who taught you. We may contact the referee to ask whether they think you would be a good recipient for the scholarship. Please seek permission from the referee before giving their details. Referee’s name:       Address:       E-mail:       Telephone (incl. country code):       What is his / her relationship to you?:       5. Scholarship support statement It is important for you to fully complete this section to support your application. Maximum 300 words for each question answer.       5.1 Please specify three opportunities where the University of West London could be effectively promoted in your country. 5.2 Please specify how you will support the University as a student ambassador to......

Words: 1270 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Be Good or Be Good at It

...Tamyra Hamilton Susan LaPlant ENGL 1102 K 2 April 2015 Be Good or Be Good At It In the article “Parents Notification Policies for Underage Drinking Evolve” by Jenna Johnson she discusses the pros and cons of informing a parent about their child’s alcohol-related actions that they condone at universities. Johnson seems to be on the fence throughout the whole article on whether she agrees or disagree with informing parents on every little detail in their child’s life pertaining to consuming or even just being around alcohol. In the article, Johnson quotes the vice president of student affairs at Virginia Tech, Edward Spencer, when he states “[s]tudents are more concerned about their parents being notified than they are of the legal consequences,” which is true because parents are more terrifying than any form of law enforcement (qtd. in Johnson). Regardless of how minor a situation is parents should be notified if their child is in any situation pertaining to alcohol. It is better for parents to know and be upset for a little while with their child than it is for the parents to not know and possibly not even have a child to be upset with because their child could be taken away from them. It is always best to expect the unexpected in any case regardless of the teenager trying to gain independence. The director of student conduct at the University of Maryland, John Zacker, said it best when he stated that “[t]here is no magical line here between May of their senior......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...Consider the following database with primary keys underlined Project(P_No, P_Name, P_Incharge) Employee(E_No, E_Name) Assigned_To(P_No, E_No) Write the relational algebra for the following : 21 AC14/AT11 (i) (ii) Database Management Systems List details of the employees working on all the projects. List E_No of employees who do not work on project number DB2003. (6) Ans: (i) (ii) Q.12 Employee (Assigned_To) ÷ ∏ p_no (Project)) ∏E_No(Assigned_To) - ∏E_No(σp_No = ‘ DB2003’ (Assigned _To)) What is a hashing function? What are the properties of a good hashing function? Describe the folding technique for hashing functions. (7) Ans: Hashing function is a technique to store a file on the disk. A hash function is a function which when applied to a value of a record (hash field) gives a hash value, which is the address of the disk block in which the record is stored. The properties of a good hash function are as follows: • It should be easy to evaluate. • The hash value obtained should be within the range of valid addresses for a given file. • The hash values should be uniformly distributed over the range of addresses so that the collisions are minimum. Folding technique for hashing functions: It involves applying an arithmetic function such as addition or a logical function like exclusive OR to different parts of a hash field to calculate the hash addresses. For example, the numeric hash field can be split into start, middle and end......

Words: 20217 - Pages: 81

Premium Essay


...which companies everywhere are thinking of strategies to increase the demand of their products. Threat of Substitute: There are substitute for everything out in the world. So goes for the mobile, and the services provided by Nokia but the problem lies in consumers switching to the substitute. The main reason is that most people don’t like to change to something new because they might find it hard to use or switch over. Power of Suppliers: If the suppliers change the price then company in this case Nokia has a direct impact on the pricing of their products. If there are more suppliers then it is easy to change from one to another if the first one is not able to provide the services a company needs. Competitive Rivalry: Business is good where there are competitors because it gives more chance to improve and go ahead of your rivals. Nokia keep their product catalogs up-to-date and keep looking for better technologies to update its mobile and services. 3.Types of Market : There are different types of markets on which a company makes strategies to fallow and consider before releasing products. Which are discussed as below. Monopoly: Nokia as a mobile manufacturer has dominated mobiles market with its high end N-series Smartphone to its low end mobiles. It was Nokia’s intentional strategy to keep ahead with the technology to keep customers interested in its products. Duopoly: It’s a market state when two companies dominate the market. In this market Nokia is......

Words: 2314 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Good We serve students in secondary through postsecondary education as well as professionals in accounting and finance. DeVry has an enrollment of 80,000+ undergraduate and graduate students. According to the university 237,000+ students have graduated since 1975. The university has more than 90 campuses throughout North America and confers degrees in technology, science, business, the arts, and management. DeVry's purpose is to empower its students to achieve their educational and career goals in the fastest time they can do. DeVry has many Strengths and Weaknesses in their system: About Strengths: * Brand Name is the first strength DeVry has. DeVry has a strong brand name in University system. With the long and good history, DeVry has a good credit school for student to attend. Also, DeVry is in the big leagues of technical, health care, and business schools. Their sale in 2011 was $2,182.4M in 2011 and income growth is 18.0%, so we can see how strong this University can bring student to their school. * Secondly, Size advantages help DeVry to lower costs and offer more products. With over 90 campuses in North America, DeVry is the largest University system in USA. So, it can decrease the cost of tuition fees and offer more majors for all students over US. In additional, we can study online with a lot of classes available for us to take. It can bring a lot of convenience for working student and people who doesn’t have ability to go to......

Words: 896 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...External and Internal Factors Business organizations strive to be the best at what they do; however, to be the best, organizations must have good managers who understand how internal and external factors affect business operations and adjust accordingly. Business managers consistently use the four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling, but the best managers understand how internal and external factors affect these four functions of management. Globalization, technology, innovation, diversity, and ethics are some of the internal and external factors that can and do influence routine decisions managers must make while planning, organizing, leading, and controlling their respective businesses. Managers also use delegation to manage the different internal and internal factors and the different management functions. Founded in 1976 in a garage behind a house, Apple Inc. through the visionary leadership of Stephen P. Jobs revolutionized the computer industry before his resignation in 1985 in large part because of his inability to respond to internal factors that should have affected his management decisions (Pollack, 1985). Over the next 10 years Apple struggled to maintain market share until Jobs returned and revolutionized the company again by deftly responding to external and internal factors to reinvent the Apple brand and return it to prominence by making products better (Bajarin, 2010). External and Internal Factors To be competitive,......

Words: 288 - Pages: 2