Premium Essay

A Bandura

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By Rg2567
Words 6800
Pages 28
Albert Bandura (born December 4, 1925, in Mundare, Alberta, Canada) is a psychologist who is the David Starr Jordan Professor Emeritus of Social Science in Psychology at Stanford University. For almost six decades, he has been responsible for contributions to many fields of psychology, including social cognitive theory, therapy and personality psychology, and was also influential in the transition between behaviorism and cognitive psychology. He is known as the originator of social learning theory and the theory of self-efficacy, and is also responsible for the influential 1961 Bobo doll experiment.
A 2002 survey ranked Bandura as the fourth most-frequently cited psychologist of all time, behind B. F. Skinner, Sigmund Freud, and Jean Piaget, and as the most cited living one.[1] Bandura is widely described as the greatest living psychologist,[2][3][4][5] and as one of the most influential psychologists of all time.[6][7]
In 1974 Bandura was elected to be the Eighty-Second President of the American Psychological Association (APA). He was one of the youngest president-elects in the history of the APA at the age of 46. Bandura served as a member of the APA Board of Scientific Affairs from 1968 to 1970 and is well known as a member of the editiorial board of nine psychology journals including the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology from 1963 to 1972.[8] At the age of 82, Bandura was awarded the Grawemeyer Award for psychology and is known as one of the most influential psychologists of the 20th century. [9] Contents [hide] * 1 Personal life * 2 Education and academic career * 2.1 Post-doctoral work * 3 Research * 3.1 Social learning theory * 3.2 Aggression * 3.3 Social cognitive theory * 3.3.1 Social foundations of thought and action * 3.4 Self-efficacy * 3.5 Moral agency * 4 Awards * 5 Major books * 6…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Albert Bandura

...Essay 4 Pieter van Rooyen 17333652 Albert bandura can be regarded as one of the most important representatives of social cognitive learning theories. He’s theory on observational learning (learning by observing behavior) is the single most important form of learning. He argues that people learn most of their behavior through observation and only a little through direct contact. The reason for this is the complexity of most behavior, and that this can’t be learned through verbal instructions. This essay will focus on the principles of observational learning, highlight the strength and weaknesses, and also how observational learning can promote positive intergroup relations on campus at the University of Stellenbosch. Observation is a common learning tool and many, if not most do it unconsciously. The term modeling is used to describe this. This is when an observer observes the behavior of a model and then repeats the behavior. There are a few factors that influence this observational learning. They are the nature of the modeled behavior, the characteristics of the model, the characteristics of the observer, the result of the models behavior and the self-efficacy perception of the observer. The nature of the modeled behavior refers to the actual behavior. The situation in which the behavior takes place and if it is new or old behavior. New behavior attracts more attention than old behavior. The characteristics of the model plays an important role in observation learning....

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Impact of Bandura's Social Learning Theory on Today's Children

...had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do.” - Albert Bandura (1977) To start, Bandura believed most human behavior is learned by watching other humans interact and perform. “Most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling: from observing others, one forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and on later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for action.” (Bandura: 1977). For example, you will notice children constantly watching others, or particularly their parents, while they are cooking, doing a project, or interacting with others. Notice the child may start to mimic the parent and try to reenact what they just saw. This is what Bandura is explaining by watching the performance and later using it in your own life. He also explains how this also influences our personalities as well. Certain actions we may have observed we will never end up using ourselves because the situation never occurs where we would use it or it is not something we would do, possibly due to our personality. Bandura himself gave an example when he had children observe an adult interacting with a Bobo Doll. The adult was very aggressive when handling the doll and the children were only allowed watching the adult, but not joining in. When the children were allowed to finally enter the room, Bandura noted the children mimicking the adult in being hostile towards the doll, which they might not have done,......

Words: 1338 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Learning Theories

...Bandura’s theories. Introduction Many theories throughout the years have been proposed to explain human behavior. Until recent times, some theorists held the belief that motivational forces in the forms of drives, needs and impulses, usually operating below the level of consciousness were the most important determinants. Since proponents of this school of thought considered the principal causes of behavior to be forces within an individual, this is where they looked for explanations as to why humans behave as they do (Bandura, 1977). This view, while it enjoyed popularity and influence, was challenged. These theories were criticized on both theoretical and experimental basis. With the exception of elementary reflexes, humankind is not equipped with inborn inventories of behavior. They must be acquired through learning. The learning process is the means through which new response patterns are obtained either by direct experiences or observation (Bandura, 1977). Web article, Theories of Learning, indicates learning to be a relatively permanent change in behavior including both observable activity and internal processes such as thinking, attitudes and emotions. The learning may not manifest itself in observable behavior until sometime after the educational program has taken place (Dunn, 2000). One of the popular definitions of learning is the concept of Gregory Kimble (1917-2006), who contends that learning is relatively a permanent change in behavior as a......

Words: 6090 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Bandura: Social Cognitive Theory

...Bandura & Social Cognitive Theory Randy Wayne Rising Liberty University Psychology of Personality 341-D06 Timothy Williams May 07, 2013 Abstract Years of research has been conducted by Albert Bandura on the Social Cognitive Theory. The practical use of Social Cognitive Theory has an interesting approach to changing or maintaining behaviors. Bandura has researched Social Cognitive Theory and the individual differences that show the flexibility that people have dealing with behavior. The Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication discusses the role that mass media plays in society in regard to influences on behavior within society. The Social Cognitive Theory of Human Agency, by Bandura, which describes the power that people posses to influence their own actions to get the deserved results the individual, desires. Social Cognitive Theory on Gender Development addresses the development of people’s lives according to the gender and the roles that are stereotypical by society in regards to personality and behavior. Health Promotion from the Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory deals with health promotion and disease prevention from social cognitive theory. The approach of changing health practices of social systems rather than the habits of individuals. Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context explains that people adapt to diverse conditions all over the world. Parents from impoverished environments through sacrifices want their children to have a......

Words: 1953 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

According to Jung (Bandura Freud) Ego Is Everything

...With this topic, I tend to agree with Jung.  Freud has contributed much to psychology, but I disagree with his thoughts on the libido being sexual in nature.  Personally, I feel as though Freud had some strange fixation on sexual urges and sex in general.  Jung’s explanation of the libido seems more generalized, but, at the same time, it seems much more encompassing. The essential features of Bandura’s observational learning concept is based on the premise that people can learn behaviors (good or bad) by just watching someone else doing the behavior (Hergenhahn & Olson, 2007). Even though they will imitate the behavior, it can be reliant on a reward or punishment system for the observational behavior. Our textbook points out that Bandura performed the Bobo doll experiment where the children watched a 5 minute film and then they had the chance to intermingle with the doll themselves. The children who watched the aggressive behaviors being rewarded did the same through observational learning. This experiment was a proven fact that children do learn from observational learning of watching it happen to others and imitating it themselves. Children that grow up in an environment (watching adults/children) or through forms of media such as movies, television shows, music, and video games where there are vicious and aggressive behaviors being implemented in them most children will imitate these. Most children will think it is okay to take on these behaviors and act them out......

Words: 2094 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

The Applicability of Albert Banduras Theory of Self-Efficacy on Academic Studying

...individual performance is thought to be highly influenced by self-efficacy , to find out what the exact effects and what the limits of this theory are, the main focus will be on the theory of self-efficacy itself. Due to these facts this piece work will deal with the question to what extent Albert Banduras theory of self-efficacy is applicable to academic studying. The main resources used are books by Bandrua himself and colleges he worked with. Since Bandura mainly worked with children there are some secondary sources which have a focus on students. Because there are three main aspects to this topic the main body consists of three chapters. Firstly the facts and features of the self-efficacy theory will be explained to understand what the rest will be based upon. The third chapter then gives a short definition about academic learning in order to find the main aspects of it. Chapter four is devoted to the link between chapter two and three. For a better understanding there will also be a distinction between self-efficacy and other related constructs. 2. The Facts and Features of Self-efficacy The concept of self-efficacy was first introduced by Albert Bandura in 1977. In his books he defines self-efficacy as “a person’s belief in his capability to organize an execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” . There are four major processes through which efficacy belief regulates human functioning . The first ones are the......

Words: 1759 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Infancy, According to Ainsworth, Erikson, and Bandura, and the Impact Neglect Has on Development

...Infancy, according to Ainsworth, Erikson, and Bandura, and the impact neglect has on development Amy Wiltsie Professor Laura Schwinn, HSV 504 Introduction Childhood neglect endured during the infancy stage of development can influence and have a “snowball effect on their subsequent successes in later stage development” (Broderick & Blewitt, 2010 p. 9). Infancy, the time between birth and 12 months old, is a critical stage of development, as human growth escalates rapidly during the first few years of life. It is a period of growth that is especially sensitive and vulnerable to the effects of maltreatment (Hildyard & Wolfe, 2002). When childhood neglect occurs during this very sensitive period, issues of safety, attachment, and social-emotional functioning are often identified as areas that need immediate intervention. The following paper will focus on the issue of early childhood neglect and the possible effects it can have on development during infancy according to three expert theorists Mary Ainsworth, Erik Erikson, and Albert Bandura. This paper is also written using the stories from “Paul”, (a pseudonym), a victim of childhood neglect: My name is Paul. I was born in 1995 to my mother who was thirteen years old. Her boyfriend, my father, was seventeen. My father was never involved in my life, as he was actively involved in criminal behavior, which ultimately led......

Words: 3931 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Bandura's Science Experiment

...Social Learning Theory is a theory that states cognitive determinism describes how behaviour is learnt through listening, watching, touching, and so forth. He also describes how internal symbolic representation process and remember information. Moreover, to further his theory Bandura is interested in the connection between children and aggressive behavior through modelling. Bandura knows that learning can be learnt through cognitive determinism, but what he wants to know is the extent that children learn through observation of adult behaviour. Instead of inheriting violent actions children can observe and imitate aggressive behaviours. Bandura believes that aggressive behaviour in children is influenced by models and media. As a result colleagues of Bandura and Bandura himself created the experiment: “The Bobo Doll Experiment”. Bandura’s hypothesis is the connection between aggressive modeling and aggressive behaviour in children, fitting with his views on social learning. Hypothesis: A hypothesis is a further way of stating a question (Galenza, 2013). Moreover, a hypothesis is the relationship between variables and predictions on what the answer to the question is going to result in. Bandura has more than one prediction in the “Bobo Doll Experiment”. He had four predictions: he predicted that children who were exposed to model aggressive behaviour would imitate that same aggression when the model was no longer present, he predicted that children who were......

Words: 977 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bandura

...behavior. | Differences:Classical: organism associates different stimuli they do not control and respond to those automatically.Operant: organism associates own behaviors with the consequences of those behaviors.“Most of the significant responses we make in everyday life are examples of operant behaviors, such as reading, writing, driving a car, and eating with utensils. Operant conditioning involves a type of learning in which behaviors are influenced mainly by the consequences that follow them”Similarities:Associative learningInvolve acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, generalization, & discriminationInfluenced by cognitive and biological dispositions. | “Albert Bandura developed social learning theory, which combined classical and operant conditioning with observational learning”. Bandura point out: * We imitate because of rewards and punishments received by the model and the imitator. * We learn to anticipate those consequences in similar situations. * We tend to imitate models we perceive as similar to us, successful, or admirable.There are four elements to Observational Learning:Attention * Learner must pay attention to the model.Memory * Learner must be able to retain the memory of what was done.Imitation * Learner must be capable of reproducing, or imitating, the actions of the model Motivation * Learner must have the desire, or motivation, to perform the action. | Resources Corey, G. (2013). Theory and practice of counseling and......

Words: 274 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Critique of Jung and Bandura

...Critique of Jung and Bandura Terrin M. Schnee Psychology 1400 Psychology of Personality Theories Spring 2014 Critique of Jung and Bandura Throughout the semester we have examined numerous psychological theorists and their theories. Their ideas were displayed focusing on the major components of each. Through this lens, we were able to familiarize ourselves with each. While each theory had many interesting parts, it was only natural that we would begin to form a bias toward some and against others. I personally took a strong inclination to Bandura and his theory of reciprocal determinism. Towards Jung, my attitude was not as positive. Bandura's theory of reciprocal determinism spoke to me on a personal level. I see applications and implications of it in both my personal life as well as in the career path I have chosen. Unlike many other theories, Bandura recognized that behavior, environment, and personal characteristics all influence one another. While I think some things may influence other things to a greater level, I agree that there is influence occurring from all components. I find other theories to be a bit flawed since they tend to focus primarily on one part as a causal agent. Bandura also believed that people were in control over their behavior. Cloninger points out that Bandura believed people controlled what they did, but vary in how they exert this control (251). To me the clearest...

Words: 1341 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Social Learning; Bandura

...Early Childhood Development and Social Inequalities by all families should have the same opportunities to live a descent life. But due to the backgrounds of some families, and children, they may not have a chance for this. There are certain risk factors that have a bearing on social inequalities in health, and particularly those that are prone to preventative intervention. There are many that I could talk about, but I have picked out four of these factors to talk about. They are biological factors, family and social factors, parenting factors, and attachment. Even these I feel that I will not be able to cover completely, because there is only a certain part we see, and then there is the that is kept hidden from all. There are many factors that influence the development and social inequalities in a child’s life. These include biological, family and social factors, parenting factors, attachment, and the way non-maternal care is influenced. All of these are risk factors that are likely to have a bearing on the child’s social inequalities on their health. The biological factors include premature birth, low birth weight, and a serious medical illness. The significantly influence and infants growth. “Low birth weight, less than 2500 grams, has a prevalence of 6 percent in white middle-class U.S. women, and 15 percent in ethnic minority teenagers. These teenagers tend to be single mothers.” At the Infant Health and Development Project, they found that in a large amount of premature......

Words: 2326 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Social Learning Theory

...What is Social Learning Theory? The social learning theory proposed by Albert Bandura has become the most influential theory of learning and development. Bandura believed that direct reinforcement could not account for all types of learning. While the behavioral theories of learning suggested that all learning was the result of associations formed by conditioning, reinforcement, and punishment, Bandura's social learning theory proposed that learning can also occur simply by observing the actions of others. His theory added a social element, arguing that people can learn new information and behaviors by watching other people. Known as observational learning (or modeling) this type of learning can be used to explain a wide variety of behaviors. People learn through observing others behavior , attitudes and outcomes of those behaviors. Social Learning Theory explains human beahvior in terms of continuous reciprocal interaction between cognitive , behavioral and environmental influences. Necessary conditions for effective modelling are: ATTENTION: various factors increases or decreases the amount of attention paid. In order to learn, you need to be paying attention. Anything that distracts your attention is going to have a negative effect on observational learning. If the model interesting or there is a novel aspect to the situation, you are far more likely to dedicate your full attention to learning. RETENTION: remembering what you paid attention to. Includes......

Words: 760 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Albert Bandura

...Albert Bandura had a theory of learning called the Social Learning Theory. The Social Learning Theory is a theory in which people learn through observing other people and their actions and reactions. (Woolfolk). Psychology cannot tell people how they ought to live their lives,. It can however, provide them with the means for effecting personal and social change.” (Bandura)"Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do.” (Cherry) Bandura performed an experiment with a doll. This famous Bobo doll experiment was observations by children of adults being aggressive with a doll. In turn, the children were observed being aggressive with the doll also. Bandura’s Social Learning Theory identifies three basic models of observational learning. The first model is a live model which is a person performing an observable behavior. A second model is a verbal model which is behaviors described and explained by a person. The third model is a symbolic model which shows humans or fake beings performing certain behaviors in T.V programs, movies, books or online. (Cherry). Observational learning is not always an effective observation due to the many people involved. This theory involves both the model and the learner (Cherry). The Social Learning Theory has four components: paying attention, retaining information or impressions, producing behaviors, and being motivated......

Words: 579 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Learning Theories of Personalities

...Learning Theories of Personalities Kristie Tripaldi, Tandy Noonan, Charlie Fritz, Jodie Bowes, and Velinda Chandler PSY/405 March 5, 2012 Angela Snelling Learning Theories of Personalities As individual’s study human behavior, he or she notices that there several theories with plenty of philosophers and psychologists to give his or her own personal observations. However, there are several limitations and strengths of learning theories. The three main theorist of the social learning theory are Albert Bandura, B.F. Skinner, and Julian Rotter. Each of these theorists describes how learning theories affect an individual’s personality. Bandura and Skinner’s theories both explain how an individual learns from his or her environment. Bandura’s social learning theory also explains an individual’s reaction to what he or she observes. Rotter’s theory provides reasoning in environment and personal factors that influences an individual’s behavior. Strengths of Learning Theories Behavior analysis can examine the results of behavior through the calculated experiments of individual, social, and cultural context application (Cherry, 2012). Pavlov’s dog is a very famous experiment of behavioral analysis that proves this theories strength. In anticipation of receiving a meal, the dog would start to salivate. Soon, the dog associated food with the white......

Words: 1659 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Personality Theories - Bandura

...Reaction to Bandera’s Social Cognitive Theory Video In order to explain his social cognitive model Bandura started his video presentation with a negative view of the world social situation. The picture of the middle class women in New Delhi, fighting for water around a water tanker, as the water supplies are depleting looks so alarming. Violence. Child traffickers, inhumane conditions, AIDS and high population growth statistics. 40% of the population in the Mideast is under 15, and this population is doubled. Young populations, living in poverty, under autocratic rulers, and plagued by corruption, in addition they’re very easily recruited for violent activities. Then he continued with woman discrimination: “In these societies women are marginalized, they’re devalued, they’re disallowed aspiration, and they’re denied their liberty and dignity”. At this part of the video Bandura opens the door for change and his social cognitive theory. He explained that the fastest way for a society to increase its human capital is to educate their women, because that is half their talent. We need to educate women and we need to do a better job with the half of the population that is written off. He confused me when addressed that we don’t need more babies. Educated woman should be prepared to have babies, career and a better status in society. He showed his model from a drama in Sudan. They include the benefits of family planning, educational opportunities for daughters, the injustice...

Words: 661 - Pages: 3